WallStSmart

Restaurant Brands International Inc (QSR)vsWPP PLC ADR (WPP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

WPP PLC ADR generates 41% more annual revenue ($13.55B vs $9.59B). QSR leads profitability with a 10.0% profit margin vs -1.6%. QSR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.94. QSR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 70/100 (B).

QSR

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 8.0Profit: 8.0Value: 8.0Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.93

WPP

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 5.7Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.73
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

QSRUndervalued (+33.6%)

Margin of Safety

+33.6%

Fair Value

$106.48

Current Price

$79.71

$26.77 discount

UndervaluedFair: $106.48Overvalued
WPPUndervalued (+75.6%)

Margin of Safety

+75.6%

Fair Value

$75.12

Current Price

$18.97

$56.15 discount

UndervaluedFair: $75.12Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

QSR4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
100.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 100.0% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
28.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 28 in profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.948/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
27.0%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.0%

WPP1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.71B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

QSR2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.932/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

WPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

Operating margin of 2.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-5.3%2/10

ROE of -5.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : QSR

The strongest argument for QSR centers on EPS Growth, Return on Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.94 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WPP

The strongest argument for WPP centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : QSR

The primary concerns for QSR are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : WPP

The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.13 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

QSR profiles as a value stock while WPP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

WPP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.65 — expect wider price swings.

QSR is growing revenue faster at 7.3% — sustainability is the question.

WPP generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

QSR scores higher overall (70/100 vs 32/100). WPP offers better value entry with a 75.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Restaurant Brands International Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Restaurant Brands International Inc. owns, operates and franchises quick-service restaurants under the Tim Hortons (TH), Burger King (BK) and Popeyes (PLK) brands. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

WPP PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?