WallStSmart

Nu Skin Enterprises Inc (NUS)vsWalmart Inc. (WMT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Walmart Inc. generates 52640% more annual revenue ($725.30B vs $1.38B). WMT leads profitability with a 3.1% profit margin vs -15.7%. NUS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.78. WMT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

NUS

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.5Value: 7.7Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 4.45

WMT

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.5Value: 3.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.66
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

NUSUndervalued (+53.3%)

Margin of Safety

+53.3%

Fair Value

$21.79

Current Price

$4.79

$17.00 discount

UndervaluedFair: $21.79Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WMT.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NUS3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
0.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.4510/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.788/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

WMT4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Market CapQuality
$909.85B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.6610/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
22.5%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

Free Cash FlowQuality
$7.47B8/10

Generating 7.5B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

NUS4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$230.73M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.9%3/10

ROE of 6.9% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-17.1%2/10

Revenue declined 17.1%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-98.2%2/10

Earnings declined 98.2%

WMT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Price/BookValuation
8.8x4/10

Trading at 8.8x book value

Profit MarginProfitability
3.1%3/10

3.1% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.2%3/10

Operating margin of 4.2%

PEG RatioValuation
4.392/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NUS

The strongest argument for NUS centers on Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.78 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WMT

The strongest argument for WMT centers on Market Cap, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : NUS

The primary concerns for NUS are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : WMT

The primary concerns for WMT are Price/Book, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. A P/E of 40.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NUS profiles as a turnaround stock while WMT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

NUS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.97 — expect wider price swings.

WMT is growing revenue faster at 7.3% — sustainability is the question.

WMT generates stronger free cash flow (7.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WMT scores higher overall (49/100 vs 47/100). NUS offers better value entry with a 53.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Nu Skin Enterprises Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. develops and distributes wellness and personal care products globally. The company is headquartered in Provo, Utah.

Visit Website →

Walmart Inc.

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · DISCOUNT STORES · USA

Walmart Inc. is an American multinational retail corporation that operates a chain of hypermarkets, discount department stores, and grocery stores from the United States, headquartered in Bentonville, Arkansas. It also owns and operates Sam's Club retail warehouses.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?