Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL)vsNu Skin Enterprises Inc (NUS)
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
$92.06
-1.19%
CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · Cap: $71.91B
NUS
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc
$4.79
-1.03%
CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · Cap: $230.73M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Colgate-Palmolive Company generates 1430% more annual revenue ($21.05B vs $1.38B). CL leads profitability with a 9.7% profit margin vs -15.7%. NUS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.78. CL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).
CL
Buy54
out of 100
Grade: C-
NUS
Hold47
out of 100
Grade: D+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+8.4%
Fair Value
$99.45
Current Price
$92.06
$7.39 discount
Margin of Safety
+53.3%
Fair Value
$21.79
Current Price
$4.79
$17.00 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Every $100 of equity generates 863 in profit
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Large-cap with strong market position
Strong operational efficiency at 21.0%
Reasonable price relative to book value
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Growing faster than its price suggests
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
4.9% revenue growth
Trading at 306.9x book value
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 6.9% — below average capital efficiency
Revenue declined 17.1%
Earnings declined 98.2%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CL
The strongest argument for CL centers on Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap.
Bull Case : NUS
The strongest argument for NUS centers on Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.78 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : CL
The primary concerns for CL are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 33.29 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Bear Case : NUS
The primary concerns for NUS are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CL profiles as a value stock while NUS is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.
NUS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.97 — expect wider price swings.
CL is growing revenue faster at 4.9% — sustainability is the question.
CL generates stronger free cash flow (867M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
CL scores higher overall (54/100 vs 47/100). NUS offers better value entry with a 53.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Colgate-Palmolive Company
CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA
Colgate-Palmolive Company is an American multinational consumer products company headquartered on Park Avenue in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. It specializes in the production, distribution and provision of household, health care, personal care and veterinary products.
Visit Website →Nu Skin Enterprises Inc
CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA
Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. develops and distributes wellness and personal care products globally. The company is headquartered in Provo, Utah.
Visit Website →Compare with Other HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?