Nu Skin Enterprises Inc (NUS)vsProcter & Gamble Company (PG)
NUS
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc
$4.79
-1.03%
CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · Cap: $230.73M
PG
Procter & Gamble Company
$145.00
-1.28%
CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · Cap: $333.27B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Procter & Gamble Company generates 6228% more annual revenue ($87.03B vs $1.38B). PG leads profitability with a 18.4% profit margin vs -15.7%. NUS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.78. PG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C).
NUS
Hold47
out of 100
Grade: D+
PG
Buy55
out of 100
Grade: C
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+53.3%
Fair Value
$21.79
Current Price
$4.79
$17.00 discount
Margin of Safety
-46.4%
Fair Value
$100.17
Current Price
$145.00
$44.83 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Reasonable price relative to book value
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Growing faster than its price suggests
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit
Strong operational efficiency at 22.1%
Generating 4.9B in free cash flow
Areas to Watch
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 6.9% — below average capital efficiency
Revenue declined 17.1%
Earnings declined 98.2%
1.5% revenue growth
Expensive relative to growth rate
Earnings declined 15.5%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : NUS
The strongest argument for NUS centers on Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.78 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : PG
The strongest argument for PG centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.4% and operating margin at 22.1%.
Bear Case : NUS
The primary concerns for NUS are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.
Bear Case : PG
The primary concerns for PG are Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
NUS profiles as a turnaround stock while PG is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
NUS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.97 — expect wider price swings.
PG is growing revenue faster at 1.5% — sustainability is the question.
PG generates stronger free cash flow (4.9B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
PG scores higher overall (55/100 vs 47/100), backed by strong 18.4% margins. NUS offers better value entry with a 53.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc
CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA
Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. develops and distributes wellness and personal care products globally. The company is headquartered in Provo, Utah.
Visit Website →Procter & Gamble Company
CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA
The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) is an American multinational consumer goods corporation headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, founded in 1837 by William Procter and James Gamble. It specializes in a wide range of personal health, consumer health, personal care, and hygiene products; these products are organized into several segments including Beauty; Grooming; Health Care; Fabric & Home Care; and Baby, Feminine, & Family Care. Before the sale of Pringles to Kellogg's, its product portfolio also included food, snacks, and beverages.
Visit Website →Compare with Other HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?