Nu Skin Enterprises Inc (NUS)vsProcter & Gamble Company (PG)
NUS
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc
$4.95
+0.94%
CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · Cap: $243.72M
PG
Procter & Gamble Company
$152.04
-2.33%
CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · Cap: $350.36B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Procter & Gamble Company generates 5917% more annual revenue ($86.72B vs $1.44B). PG leads profitability with a 19.2% profit margin vs 3.8%. NUS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.78. PG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).
NUS
Buy51
out of 100
Grade: C-
PG
Buy59
out of 100
Grade: C
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+56.5%
Fair Value
$23.36
Current Price
$4.95
$18.41 discount
Margin of Safety
-51.5%
Fair Value
$99.28
Current Price
$152.04
$52.76 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Growing faster than its price suggests
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Every $100 of equity generates 31 in profit
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Strong operational efficiency at 23.1%
Generating 3.0B in free cash flow
Areas to Watch
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 6.9% — below average capital efficiency
3.8% margin — thin
Operating margin of 1.8%
Expensive relative to growth rate
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : NUS
The strongest argument for NUS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.78 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : PG
The strongest argument for PG centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.2% and operating margin at 23.1%.
Bear Case : NUS
The primary concerns for NUS are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 3.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : PG
The primary concerns for PG are PEG Ratio.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
NUS profiles as a value stock while PG is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.
NUS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.95 — expect wider price swings.
PG is growing revenue faster at 7.4% — sustainability is the question.
PG generates stronger free cash flow (3.0B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
PG scores higher overall (59/100 vs 51/100), backed by strong 19.2% margins. NUS offers better value entry with a 56.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc
CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA
Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. develops and distributes wellness and personal care products globally. The company is headquartered in Provo, Utah.
Visit Website →Procter & Gamble Company
CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA
The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) is an American multinational consumer goods corporation headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, founded in 1837 by William Procter and James Gamble. It specializes in a wide range of personal health, consumer health, personal care, and hygiene products; these products are organized into several segments including Beauty; Grooming; Health Care; Fabric & Home Care; and Baby, Feminine, & Family Care. Before the sale of Pringles to Kellogg's, its product portfolio also included food, snacks, and beverages.
Visit Website →Compare with Other HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?