WallStSmart

NeoGenomics Inc (NEO)vsNatera Inc (NTRA)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Natera Inc generates 253% more annual revenue ($2.71B vs $766.29M). NEO leads profitability with a -6.8% profit margin vs -7.1%. NEO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D+).

NEO

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.04

NTRA

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.82
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

NEOUndervalued (+77.9%)

Margin of Safety

+77.9%

Fair Value

$51.87

Current Price

$17.99

$33.88 discount

UndervaluedFair: $51.87Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for NTRA.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NEO2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
130.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 130.6% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

NTRA3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
37.7%10/10

Revenue surging 37.7% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$58.35B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.139/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

NEO4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.094/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.0%2/10

ROE of -12.0% — below average capital efficiency

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.042/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

NTRA4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Price/BookValuation
33.5x2/10

Trading at 33.5x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-10.6%2/10

ROE of -10.6% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NEO

The strongest argument for NEO centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 11.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : NTRA

The strongest argument for NTRA centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 37.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : NEO

The primary concerns for NEO are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : NTRA

The primary concerns for NTRA are EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NEO profiles as a turnaround stock while NTRA is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

NEO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.78 — expect wider price swings.

NTRA is growing revenue faster at 37.7% — sustainability is the question.

NEO generates stronger free cash flow (12M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

NEO scores higher overall (45/100 vs 31/100) and 11.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

NeoGenomics Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

NeoGenomics, Inc. operates a network of cancer-focused testing laboratories in the United States, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Fort Myers, Florida.

Natera Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Natera, Inc., a diagnostic company, develops and markets molecular testing services globally. The company is headquartered in San Carlos, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?