WallStSmart

NeoGenomics Inc (NEO)vsNatera Inc (NTRA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Natera Inc generates 235% more annual revenue ($2.50B vs $745.97M). NTRA leads profitability with a -9.1% profit margin vs -13.3%. NEO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

NEO

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.14

NTRA

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 3/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

NEOUndervalued (+77.8%)

Margin of Safety

+77.8%

Fair Value

$51.46

Current Price

$10.90

$40.56 discount

UndervaluedFair: $51.46Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for NTRA.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NEO2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
130.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 130.6% YoY

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

NTRA2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
38.8%10/10

Revenue surging 38.8% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.149/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

NEO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.094/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Market CapQuality
$1.37B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.0%2/10

ROE of -12.0% — below average capital efficiency

NTRA4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
17.3x4/10

Trading at 17.3x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.8%2/10

ROE of -12.8% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NEO

The strongest argument for NEO centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 11.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : NTRA

The strongest argument for NTRA centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 38.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : NEO

The primary concerns for NEO are PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : NTRA

The primary concerns for NTRA are Price/Book, EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NEO profiles as a turnaround stock while NTRA is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

NEO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.80 — expect wider price swings.

NTRA is growing revenue faster at 38.8% — sustainability is the question.

NTRA generates stronger free cash flow (18M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

NEO scores higher overall (51/100 vs 31/100) and 11.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

NeoGenomics Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

NeoGenomics, Inc. operates a network of cancer-focused testing laboratories in the United States, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Fort Myers, Florida.

Natera Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Natera, Inc., a diagnostic company, develops and markets molecular testing services globally. The company is headquartered in San Carlos, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?