WallStSmart

Danaher Corporation (DHR)vsNeoGenomics Inc (NEO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Danaher Corporation generates 3266% more annual revenue ($25.11B vs $745.97M). DHR leads profitability with a 16.0% profit margin vs -13.3%. DHR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.15. DHR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

DHR

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.36

NEO

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.04
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

DHRSignificantly Overvalued (-66.7%)

Margin of Safety

-66.7%

Fair Value

$117.88

Current Price

$196.22

$78.34 premium

UndervaluedFair: $117.88Overvalued
NEOUndervalued (+77.5%)

Margin of Safety

+77.5%

Fair Value

$50.82

Current Price

$15.88

$34.94 discount

UndervaluedFair: $50.82Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DHR4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
59.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 59.7% YoY

Market CapQuality
$125.93B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.26B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

NEO2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
130.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 130.6% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

DHR2 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
7.6%3/10

ROE of 7.6% — below average capital efficiency

NEO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.094/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Market CapQuality
$1.88B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.0%2/10

ROE of -12.0% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DHR

The strongest argument for DHR centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.0% and operating margin at 18.0%. PEG of 1.15 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : NEO

The strongest argument for NEO centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 11.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : DHR

The primary concerns for DHR are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : NEO

The primary concerns for NEO are PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DHR profiles as a mature stock while NEO is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

NEO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.74 — expect wider price swings.

NEO is growing revenue faster at 11.1% — sustainability is the question.

DHR generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

DHR scores higher overall (66/100 vs 46/100), backed by strong 16.0% margins. NEO offers better value entry with a 77.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Danaher Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Danaher Corporation is an American globally diversified conglomerate with its headquarters in Washington, D.C.. The company designs, manufactures, and markets professional, medical, industrial, and commercial products and services. The company's 3 platforms are Life Sciences, Diagnostics, and Environmental & Applied Solutions.

NeoGenomics Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

NeoGenomics, Inc. operates a network of cancer-focused testing laboratories in the United States, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Fort Myers, Florida.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?