WallStSmart

NeoGenomics Inc (NEO)vsThermo Fisher Scientific Inc (TMO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc generates 5947% more annual revenue ($46.34B vs $766.29M). TMO leads profitability with a 15.0% profit margin vs -6.8%. TMO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.80. TMO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C+).

NEO

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.04

TMO

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.0Value: 3.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.13
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

NEOUndervalued (+78.2%)

Margin of Safety

+78.2%

Fair Value

$52.45

Current Price

$17.32

$35.13 discount

UndervaluedFair: $52.45Overvalued
TMOSignificantly Overvalued (-76.7%)

Margin of Safety

-76.7%

Fair Value

$345.06

Current Price

$609.82

$264.76 premium

UndervaluedFair: $345.06Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NEO2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
130.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 130.6% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TMO2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$225.48B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.68B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

NEO4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.094/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.0%2/10

ROE of -12.0% — below average capital efficiency

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.042/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

TMO3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.804/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
32.5x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NEO

The strongest argument for NEO centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 11.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TMO

The strongest argument for TMO centers on Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. Revenue growth of 10.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : NEO

The primary concerns for NEO are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : TMO

The primary concerns for TMO are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NEO profiles as a turnaround stock while TMO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

NEO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.75 — expect wider price swings.

NEO is growing revenue faster at 11.2% — sustainability is the question.

TMO generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TMO scores higher overall (60/100 vs 48/100) and 10.5% revenue growth. NEO offers better value entry with a 78.2% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

NeoGenomics Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

NeoGenomics, Inc. operates a network of cancer-focused testing laboratories in the United States, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Fort Myers, Florida.

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Thermo Fisher Scientific is an American provisioner of scientific instrumentation, reagents and consumables, and software and services to healthcare, life science, and other laboratories in academia, government, and industry (including in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors). Based in Waltham, Massachusetts, Thermo Fisher was created in 2006 by the merger of Thermo Electron and Fisher Scientific, to form a company with US$ 9 billion in combined revenues.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?