WallStSmart

Morgan Stanley (MS)vsStifel Financial Corporation (SF)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Morgan Stanley generates 1180% more annual revenue ($70.30B vs $5.49B). MS leads profitability with a 24.0% profit margin vs 12.4%. SF appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.11. MS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 76/100 (B+).

MS

Strong Buy

76

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.5Value: 10.0Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 3/9

SF

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 6.5Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 3/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

MSUndervalued (+59.3%)

Margin of Safety

+59.3%

Fair Value

$407.18

Current Price

$165.65

$241.53 discount

UndervaluedFair: $407.18Overvalued
SFSignificantly Overvalued (-34.0%)

Margin of Safety

-34.0%

Fair Value

$92.51

Current Price

$72.53

$19.98 premium

UndervaluedFair: $92.51Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MS6 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$263.03B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Operating MarginProfitability
38.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 38.6%

Profit MarginProfitability
24.0%9/10

Keeps 24 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
16.2x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
20.7%8/10

Earnings expanding 20.7% YoY

SF2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
27.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.4%

Areas to Watch

MS3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.834/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-4.60B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

SF1 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MS

The strongest argument for MS centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 24.0% and operating margin at 38.6%. Revenue growth of 11.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SF

The strongest argument for SF centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 14.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.11 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : MS

The primary concerns for MS are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : SF

The primary concerns for SF are Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MS profiles as a mature stock while SF is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

MS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.21 — expect wider price swings.

SF is growing revenue faster at 14.6% — sustainability is the question.

SF generates stronger free cash flow (307M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MS scores higher overall (76/100 vs 68/100), backed by strong 24.0% margins and 11.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Morgan Stanley

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

Morgan Stanley is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered at 1585 Broadway in the Morgan Stanley Building, Midtown Manhattan, New York City.

Stifel Financial Corporation

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

Stifel Financial Corp. The company is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?