Interactive Brokers Group Inc (IBKR)vsStifel Financial Corporation (SF)
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group Inc
$90.48
+4.89%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $158.60B
SF
Stifel Financial Corporation
$82.63
+0.87%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $11.84B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Interactive Brokers Group Inc generates 21% more annual revenue ($6.87B vs $5.67B). IBKR leads profitability with a 16.4% profit margin vs 15.6%. SF appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.01. SF earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 76/100 (B+).
IBKR
Strong Buy68
out of 100
Grade: B-
SF
Strong Buy76
out of 100
Grade: B+
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Strong operational efficiency at 76.8%
Large-cap with strong market position
Revenue surging 23.7% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 36.9% YoY
Generating 3.6B in free cash flow
Earnings expanding 469.2% YoY
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Strong operational efficiency at 21.6%
Areas to Watch
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Distress zone — elevated risk
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : IBKR
The strongest argument for IBKR centers on Operating Margin, Market Cap, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.4% and operating margin at 76.8%. Revenue growth of 23.7% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : SF
The strongest argument for SF centers on EPS Growth, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.6% and operating margin at 21.6%. Revenue growth of 14.3% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : IBKR
The primary concerns for IBKR are P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 7.69 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Bear Case : SF
The primary concerns for SF are Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
IBKR profiles as a growth stock while SF is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.
IBKR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.33 — expect wider price swings.
IBKR is growing revenue faster at 23.7% — sustainability is the question.
IBKR generates stronger free cash flow (3.6B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
SF scores higher overall (76/100 vs 68/100), backed by strong 15.6% margins and 14.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Interactive Brokers Group Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. is a global automated electronic broker. The company is headquartered in Greenwich, Connecticut.
Stifel Financial Corporation
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA
Stifel Financial Corp. The company is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.
Compare with Other CAPITAL MARKETS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?