MP Materials Corp (MP)vsPenske Automotive Group Inc (PAG)

MP

MP Materials Corp

NYSE

$67.43

-2.46%

BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $12.28B

PAG

Penske Automotive Group Inc

NYSE

$173.81

+1.28%

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $11.16B

⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Penske Automotive Group Inc generates 11415% more annual revenue ($31.72B vs $275.46M). PAG leads profitability with a 2.9% profit margin vs -31.2%. PAG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

MP

Avoid

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0

Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.13

PAG

Buy

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.5Value: 5.3Quality: 4.3

Piotroski: 4/9

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MP.

PAGFair Value (-1.7%)

Margin of Safety

-1.7%

Fair Value

$170.26

Current Price

$173.81

$3.55 premium

UndervaluedFair: $170.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MP1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10

Revenue GrowthGrowth

70.0%10/10

Revenue surging 70.0% year-over-year

PAG2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10

P/E RatioValuation

12.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation

2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

MP4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10

Return on EquityProfitability

-5.0%2/10

ROE of -5.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth

-55.6%2/10

Earnings declined 55.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality

$-79.28M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth

1.132/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

PAG4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10

PEG RatioValuation

2.094/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability

2.9%3/10

2.9% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability

3.7%3/10

Operating margin of 3.7%

Debt/EquityHealth

1.563/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MP

The strongest argument for MP centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 70.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : PAG

The strongest argument for PAG centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : MP

The primary concerns for MP are Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : PAG

The primary concerns for PAG are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 1.56 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 2.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MP profiles as a hypergrowth stock while PAG is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

MP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.91 — expect wider price swings.

MP is growing revenue faster at 70.0% — sustainability is the question.

PAG generates stronger free cash flow (152M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PAG scores higher overall (51/100 vs 28/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

MP Materials Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

MP Materials Corp. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Penske Automotive Group Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Penske Automotive Group, Inc., a diversified transportation services company, operates commercial and automotive truck dealerships. The company is headquartered in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan.

Visit Website →

Compare with Other OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING Stocks

MP vs BHP MP vs RIO MP vs VALE MP vs TECK MP vs USAR PAG vs BHP PAG vs RIO PAG vs VALE PAG vs TECK PAG vs USAR

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?

Full MP Analysis →Full PAG Analysis →