WallStSmart

Maximus Inc (MMS)vsThomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares (TRI)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Thomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares generates 49% more annual revenue ($7.83B vs $5.25B). TRI leads profitability with a 21.2% profit margin vs 7.1%. TRI appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.59. TRI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

MMS

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.5Value: 8.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.69

TRI

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.5Value: 4.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.63
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

MMSUndervalued (+58.2%)

Margin of Safety

+58.2%

Fair Value

$181.31

Current Price

$56.92

$124.39 discount

UndervaluedFair: $181.31Overvalued
TRISignificantly Overvalued (-47.1%)

Margin of Safety

-47.1%

Fair Value

$60.64

Current Price

$97.35

$36.71 premium

UndervaluedFair: $60.64Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MMS3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.3x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
22.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TRI4 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
21.2%9/10

Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Debt/EquityHealth
0.299/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Operating MarginProfitability
28.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
47.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 47.2% YoY

Areas to Watch

MMS4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.064/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
4.8%4/10

4.8% earnings growth

Profit MarginProfitability
7.1%3/10

7.1% margin — thin

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.1%2/10

Revenue declined 5.1%

TRI2 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.594/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
27.9x4/10

Moderate valuation

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MMS

The strongest argument for MMS centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Price/Book.

Bull Case : TRI

The strongest argument for TRI centers on Profit Margin, Debt/Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 21.2% and operating margin at 28.3%.

Bear Case : MMS

The primary concerns for MMS are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : TRI

The primary concerns for TRI are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MMS profiles as a value stock while TRI is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

MMS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.58 — expect wider price swings.

TRI is growing revenue faster at 9.5% — sustainability is the question.

TRI generates stronger free cash flow (722M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TRI scores higher overall (63/100 vs 58/100), backed by strong 21.2% margins. MMS offers better value entry with a 58.2% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Maximus Inc

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

Maximus, Inc. provides Business Process Services (BPS) to government health and human services programs worldwide. The company is headquartered in Reston, Virginia.

Visit Website →

Thomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

Thomson Reuters Corporation provides business information services in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?