WallStSmart

Mistras Group Inc (MG)vsMSA Safety (MSA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

MSA Safety generates 163% more annual revenue ($1.95B vs $739.17M). MSA leads profitability with a 16.1% profit margin vs 3.6%. MG appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.94. MSA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

MG

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 2.01

MSA

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.0Value: 6.3Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.06
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

MGUndervalued (+18.1%)

Margin of Safety

+18.1%

Fair Value

$17.40

Current Price

$19.81

$2.41 discount

UndervaluedFair: $17.40Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MSA.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MG3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
139.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 139.7% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
0.948/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

MSA5 strengths · Avg: 8.6/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.0610/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
21.4%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.998/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
24.6%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 24.6%

EPS GrowthGrowth
40.3%8/10

Earnings expanding 40.3% YoY

Areas to Watch

MG4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$608.97M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

3.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

MSA1 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MG

The strongest argument for MG centers on EPS Growth, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.94 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : MSA

The strongest argument for MSA centers on Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, PEG Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.1% and operating margin at 24.6%. PEG of 0.99 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : MG

The primary concerns for MG are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : MSA

The primary concerns for MSA are Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MG profiles as a value stock while MSA is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

MSA carries more volatility with a beta of 0.94 — expect wider price swings.

MSA is growing revenue faster at 6.2% — sustainability is the question.

MSA generates stronger free cash flow (83M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MSA scores higher overall (72/100 vs 61/100), backed by strong 16.1% margins. MG offers better value entry with a 18.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Mistras Group Inc

INDUSTRIALS · SECURITY & PROTECTION SERVICES · USA

Mistras Group, Inc. provides technology-enabled asset protection solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Princeton Junction, New Jersey.

MSA Safety

INDUSTRIALS · SECURITY & PROTECTION SERVICES · USA

MSA Safety Incorporated develops, manufactures, and supplies safety products that protect people and facility infrastructure in the oil, gas, petrochemical, fire, construction, industrial manufacturing, utility, military, and mining industries in America. North, Latin America and internationally. . The company is headquartered in Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?