WallStSmart

MEDIFAST INC (MED)vsRollins Inc (ROL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Rollins Inc generates 875% more annual revenue ($3.76B vs $385.79M). ROL leads profitability with a 14.0% profit margin vs -4.8%. MED appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.97. ROL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

MED

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 5.46

ROL

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 8.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.64
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MED.

ROLSignificantly Overvalued (-165.8%)

Margin of Safety

-165.8%

Fair Value

$24.68

Current Price

$53.48

$28.80 premium

UndervaluedFair: $24.68Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MED3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
0.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.4610/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.978/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

ROL1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
38.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 39 in profit

Areas to Watch

MED4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$109.91M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-9.1%2/10

ROE of -9.1% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-36.9%2/10

Revenue declined 36.9%

ROL4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
18.7x4/10

Trading at 18.7x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.842/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
49.1x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MED

The strongest argument for MED centers on Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.97 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : ROL

The strongest argument for ROL centers on Return on Equity.

Bear Case : MED

The primary concerns for MED are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : ROL

The primary concerns for ROL are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 49.1x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MED profiles as a turnaround stock while ROL is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

ROL carries more volatility with a beta of 0.80 — expect wider price swings.

ROL is growing revenue faster at 9.7% — sustainability is the question.

ROL generates stronger free cash flow (159M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ROL scores higher overall (52/100 vs 45/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

MEDIFAST INC

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · PERSONAL SERVICES · USA

Medifast, Inc. manufactures and distributes weight loss, weight management, healthy living products, and other consumable health and nutrition products in the United States and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland.

Visit Website →

Rollins Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · PERSONAL SERVICES · USA

Rollins, Inc. is a North American consumer and commercial services company.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?