WallStSmart

LegalZoom.com Inc (LZ)vsThomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares (TRI)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Thomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares generates 883% more annual revenue ($7.66B vs $779.71M). TRI leads profitability with a 19.9% profit margin vs 1.5%. TRI trades at a lower P/E of 28.2x. TRI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C+).

LZ

Hold

36

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -1.25

TRI

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.63
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LZUndervalued (+27.6%)

Margin of Safety

+27.6%

Fair Value

$9.82

Current Price

$8.42

$1.40 discount

UndervaluedFair: $9.82Overvalued
TRISignificantly Overvalued (-52.5%)

Margin of Safety

-52.5%

Fair Value

$58.50

Current Price

$106.34

$47.84 premium

UndervaluedFair: $58.50Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LZ1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.109/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

TRI2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
30.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 30.3%

Debt/EquityHealth
0.219/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

LZ4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
9.9x4/10

Trading at 9.9x book value

Market CapQuality
$1.33B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
7.8%3/10

ROE of 7.8% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.5%3/10

1.5% margin — thin

TRI1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.2x4/10

Moderate valuation

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LZ

The strongest argument for LZ centers on Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 12.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TRI

The strongest argument for TRI centers on Operating Margin, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.9% and operating margin at 30.3%. PEG of 1.32 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : LZ

The primary concerns for LZ are Price/Book, Market Cap, Return on Equity. A P/E of 128.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.5% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : TRI

The primary concerns for TRI are P/E Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LZ profiles as a value stock while TRI is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

LZ carries more volatility with a beta of 1.31 — expect wider price swings.

LZ is growing revenue faster at 12.9% — sustainability is the question.

TRI generates stronger free cash flow (349M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TRI scores higher overall (60/100 vs 36/100), backed by strong 19.9% margins. LZ offers better value entry with a 27.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

LegalZoom.com Inc

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

LegalZoom.com, Inc. operates an online platform for legal and compliance solutions in the United States. The company is headquartered in Glendale, California.

Thomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

Thomson Reuters Corporation provides business information services in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?