WallStSmart

LegalZoom.com Inc (LZ)vsThomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares (TRI)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Thomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares generates 888% more annual revenue ($7.83B vs $792.49M). TRI leads profitability with a 21.2% profit margin vs 2.1%. TRI trades at a lower P/E of 32.3x. TRI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

LZ

Hold

37

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 5.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -1.25

TRI

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.5Value: 4.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.63
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LZUndervalued (+25.6%)

Margin of Safety

+25.6%

Fair Value

$9.56

Current Price

$6.61

$2.95 discount

UndervaluedFair: $9.56Overvalued
TRISignificantly Overvalued (-46.0%)

Margin of Safety

-46.0%

Fair Value

$61.08

Current Price

$116.09

$55.01 premium

UndervaluedFair: $61.08Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LZ1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.129/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

TRI5 strengths · Avg: 8.6/10
Market CapQuality
$53.36B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Profit MarginProfitability
21.2%9/10

Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Debt/EquityHealth
0.299/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Operating MarginProfitability
28.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
47.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 47.2% YoY

Areas to Watch

LZ4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
8.7x4/10

Trading at 8.7x book value

Market CapQuality
$1.06B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
2.1%3/10

2.1% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

TRI1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
32.3x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LZ

The strongest argument for LZ centers on Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : TRI

The strongest argument for TRI centers on Market Cap, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 21.2% and operating margin at 28.3%. PEG of 1.22 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : LZ

The primary concerns for LZ are Price/Book, Market Cap, Profit Margin. A P/E of 68.9x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : TRI

The primary concerns for TRI are P/E Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LZ profiles as a value stock while TRI is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

LZ carries more volatility with a beta of 1.21 — expect wider price swings.

TRI is growing revenue faster at 9.5% — sustainability is the question.

TRI generates stronger free cash flow (722M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TRI scores higher overall (65/100 vs 37/100), backed by strong 21.2% margins. LZ offers better value entry with a 25.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

LegalZoom.com Inc

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

LegalZoom.com, Inc. operates an online platform for legal and compliance solutions in the United States. The company is headquartered in Glendale, California.

Thomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

Thomson Reuters Corporation provides business information services in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?