WallStSmart

Lowe's Companies Inc (LOW)vsLululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lowe's Companies Inc generates 715% more annual revenue ($90.43B vs $11.09B). LULU leads profitability with a 12.8% profit margin vs 7.3%. LULU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.05. LULU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

LOW

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 5.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.97

LULU

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.5Value: 8.7Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.12
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LOWSignificantly Overvalued (-44.4%)

Margin of Safety

-44.4%

Fair Value

$144.78

Current Price

$218.12

$73.34 premium

UndervaluedFair: $144.78Overvalued
LULUUndervalued (+70.2%)

Margin of Safety

+70.2%

Fair Value

$589.81

Current Price

$107.83

$481.98 discount

UndervaluedFair: $589.81Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LOW4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-5.6510/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$117.30B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
17.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.12B8/10

Generating 3.1B in free cash flow

LULU4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.1210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
29.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

LOW4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.974/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.3%3/10

7.3% margin — thin

LULU3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-4.3%2/10

Revenue declined 4.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-5.9%2/10

Earnings declined 5.9%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LOW

The strongest argument for LOW centers on Debt/Equity, Market Cap, P/E Ratio. PEG of 1.33 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : LULU

The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. PEG of 1.05 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : LOW

The primary concerns for LOW are EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : LULU

The primary concerns for LULU are Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LOW profiles as a value stock while LULU is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

LULU carries more volatility with a beta of 0.92 — expect wider price swings.

LOW is growing revenue faster at 8.3% — sustainability is the question.

LOW generates stronger free cash flow (3.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LULU scores higher overall (60/100 vs 50/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lowe's Companies Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Lowe's Companies, Inc. is an American retail company specializing in home improvement. Headquartered in Mooresville, North Carolina, the company operates a chain of retail stores in the United States and Canada.

Visit Website →

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?