WallStSmart

Lennar Corporation (LEN)vsTaylor Morn Home (TMHC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lennar Corporation generates 330% more annual revenue ($32.74B vs $7.61B). TMHC leads profitability with a 8.8% profit margin vs 4.9%. TMHC appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.41. TMHC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

LEN

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.0Value: 5.3Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.66

TMHC

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.0Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 3.73
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LENUndervalued (+12.5%)

Margin of Safety

+12.5%

Fair Value

$138.29

Current Price

$87.02

$51.27 discount

UndervaluedFair: $138.29Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TMHC.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LEN4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.6610/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.299/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
12.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

TMHC3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.7310/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

LEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
7.5%3/10

ROE of 7.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

4.9% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
11.302/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

TMHC4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-26.8%2/10

Revenue declined 26.8%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-51.2%2/10

Earnings declined 51.2%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-20.39M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LEN

The strongest argument for LEN centers on Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : TMHC

The strongest argument for TMHC centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 1.41 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : LEN

The primary concerns for LEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 4.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : TMHC

The primary concerns for TMHC are Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

TMHC carries more volatility with a beta of 1.44 — expect wider price swings.

LEN is growing revenue faster at -5.2% — sustainability is the question.

TMHC generates stronger free cash flow (-20M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

TMHC scores higher overall (56/100 vs 48/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lennar Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION · USA

Lennar Corporation is a home construction and real estate company based in Fontainebleau, Florida.

Visit Website →

Taylor Morn Home

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION · USA

Taylor Morrison Home Corporation, is a public housing builder in the United States. The company is headquartered in Scottsdale, Arizona.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?