WallStSmart

Lennar Corporation (LEN)vsLive Ventures Inc (LIVE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lennar Corporation generates 7439% more annual revenue ($32.74B vs $434.25M). LEN leads profitability with a 4.9% profit margin vs -0.6%. LEN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

LEN

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.0Value: 5.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.66

LIVE

Avoid

30

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 3.5Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.02
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LENUndervalued (+11.8%)

Margin of Safety

+11.8%

Fair Value

$137.20

Current Price

$76.43

$60.77 discount

UndervaluedFair: $137.20Overvalued
LIVEUndervalued (+85.8%)

Margin of Safety

+85.8%

Fair Value

$137.54

Current Price

$7.99

$129.55 discount

UndervaluedFair: $137.54Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LEN3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.6610/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

P/E RatioValuation
12.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

LIVE1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

LEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
6.1%3/10

ROE of 6.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

4.9% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
11.302/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

LIVE4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$23.96M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
4.2%3/10

ROE of 4.2% — below average capital efficiency

Operating MarginProfitability
4.8%3/10

Operating margin of 4.8%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LEN

The strongest argument for LEN centers on Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, P/E Ratio.

Bull Case : LIVE

The strongest argument for LIVE centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : LEN

The primary concerns for LEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 4.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : LIVE

The primary concerns for LIVE are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 2.44 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LEN profiles as a value stock while LIVE is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

LEN carries more volatility with a beta of 1.40 — expect wider price swings.

LIVE is growing revenue faster at -3.2% — sustainability is the question.

LIVE generates stronger free cash flow (5M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LEN scores higher overall (48/100 vs 30/100). LIVE offers better value entry with a 85.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lennar Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION · USA

Lennar Corporation is a home construction and real estate company based in Fontainebleau, Florida.

Visit Website →

Live Ventures Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Live Ventures Incorporated is engaged in flooring manufacturing, steel fabrication and retail businesses in the United States. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?