WallStSmart

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited (LANV)vsLowe's Companies Inc (LOW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lowe's Companies Inc generates 35778% more annual revenue ($86.29B vs $240.50M). LOW leads profitability with a 7.7% profit margin vs -99.2%. LOW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 44/100 (D).

LANV

Avoid

28

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 3.3Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -2.33

LOW

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 4.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.16
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LANVUndervalued (+51.9%)

Margin of Safety

+51.9%

Fair Value

$3.12

Current Price

$1.63

$1.49 discount

UndervaluedFair: $3.12Overvalued
LOWSignificantly Overvalued (-34.2%)

Margin of Safety

-34.2%

Fair Value

$167.88

Current Price

$233.37

$65.49 premium

UndervaluedFair: $167.88Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LANV1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-5.1910/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

LOW2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-4.3110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$130.68B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

LANV4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$227.84M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-285.3%2/10

ROE of -285.3% — below average capital efficiency

LOW4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.484/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.7%3/10

7.7% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-11.0%2/10

Earnings declined 11.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LANV

The strongest argument for LANV centers on Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : LOW

The strongest argument for LOW centers on Debt/Equity, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 10.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : LANV

The primary concerns for LANV are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : LOW

The primary concerns for LOW are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LANV profiles as a turnaround stock while LOW is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

LOW carries more volatility with a beta of 0.96 — expect wider price swings.

LOW is growing revenue faster at 10.9% — sustainability is the question.

LOW generates stronger free cash flow (964M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LOW scores higher overall (44/100 vs 28/100) and 10.9% revenue growth. LANV offers better value entry with a 51.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LUXURY GOODS · USA

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited manufactures and sells fashion apparel, accessories, and fragrances for men and women.

Visit Website →

Lowe's Companies Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Lowe's Companies, Inc. is an American retail company specializing in home improvement. Headquartered in Mooresville, North Carolina, the company operates a chain of retail stores in the United States and Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?