WallStSmart

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited (LANV)vsTapestry Inc (TPR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Tapestry Inc generates 3449% more annual revenue ($8.00B vs $225.53M). TPR leads profitability with a 19.1% profit margin vs -99.6%. TPR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

LANV

Avoid

28

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.0Value: 6.0Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -5.01

TPR

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 9.0Value: 5.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.76
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LANVUndervalued (+29.3%)

Margin of Safety

+29.3%

Fair Value

$2.12

Current Price

$1.08

$1.04 discount

UndervaluedFair: $2.12Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TPR.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LANV0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

TPR3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
220.7%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 221 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
73.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 73.7% YoY

P/E RatioValuation
16.2x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

LANV4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$148.16M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-285.3%2/10

ROE of -285.3% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-12.9%2/10

Revenue declined 12.9%

TPR4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.754/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.764/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Price/BookValuation
33.3x2/10

Trading at 33.3x book value

Debt/EquityHealth
5.711/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LANV

LANV has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bull Case : TPR

The strongest argument for TPR centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.1% and operating margin at 19.8%.

Bear Case : LANV

The primary concerns for LANV are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : TPR

The primary concerns for TPR are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Price/Book. Debt-to-equity of 5.71 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LANV profiles as a turnaround stock while TPR is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

TPR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.43 — expect wider price swings.

TPR is growing revenue faster at 8.9% — sustainability is the question.

TPR generates stronger free cash flow (469M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TPR scores higher overall (68/100 vs 28/100), backed by strong 19.1% margins. LANV offers better value entry with a 29.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LUXURY GOODS · USA

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited manufactures and sells fashion apparel, accessories, and fragrances for men and women.

Visit Website →

Tapestry Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LUXURY GOODS · USA

Tapestry, Inc. is an American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It is based in New York City and is the parent company of three major brands: Coach New York, Kate Spade New York and Stuart Weitzman.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?