WallStSmart

Katapult Holdings Inc (KPLT)vsPalo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 3211% more annual revenue ($9.89B vs $298.84M). PANW leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs 4.3%. KPLT trades at a lower P/E of 5.2x. PANW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

KPLT

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 8.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.34

PANW

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KPLTUndervalued (+39.8%)

Margin of Safety

+39.8%

Fair Value

$11.18

Current Price

$5.95

$5.23 discount

UndervaluedFair: $11.18Overvalued
PANWUndervalued (+39.7%)

Margin of Safety

+39.7%

Fair Value

$441.96

Current Price

$272.05

$169.91 discount

UndervaluedFair: $441.96Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KPLT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
5.2x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Debt/EquityHealth
-2.2610/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PANW3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Market CapQuality
$241.01B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

KPLT4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$29.31M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
4.3%3/10

4.3% margin — thin

Return on EquityProfitability
-340.8%2/10

ROE of -340.8% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-18.4%2/10

Earnings declined 18.4%

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
3.0%3/10

ROE of 3.0% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.042/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
256.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KPLT

The strongest argument for KPLT centers on P/E Ratio, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on Market Cap, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 14.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : KPLT

The primary concerns for KPLT are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Thin 4.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 256.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KPLT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.51 — expect wider price swings.

PANW is growing revenue faster at 14.9% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (788M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

PANW scores higher overall (57/100 vs 34/100) and 14.9% revenue growth. KPLT offers better value entry with a 39.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Katapult Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Katapult Group, Inc., doing business as Zibby, develops and operates a monthly lease-to-own payment platform to help consumers purchase durable goods from retailers in the United States. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?