WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsTransAlta Corp (TAC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TransAlta Corp generates 120% more annual revenue ($2.21B vs $1.01B). KEN leads profitability with a 8.0% profit margin vs -7.7%. KEN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

KEN

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 9.3Profit: 4.0Value: 3.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.88

TAC

Avoid

33

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.0Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.19
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-60.0%)

Margin of Safety

-60.0%

Fair Value

$47.69

Current Price

$75.10

$27.41 premium

UndervaluedFair: $47.69Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TAC.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
73.2%10/10

Revenue surging 73.2% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
122.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 122.7% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TAC0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.884/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
4.2%3/10

ROE of 4.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
8.0%3/10

8.0% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
1.3%3/10

Operating margin of 1.3%

TAC4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
11.3x4/10

Trading at 11.3x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.982/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.1%2/10

ROE of -12.1% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 73.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TAC

TAC has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 47.0x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 1.64 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TAC

The primary concerns for TAC are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 3.17 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a hypergrowth stock while TAC is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

TAC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.49 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 73.2% — sustainability is the question.

TAC generates stronger free cash flow (93M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KEN scores higher overall (51/100 vs 33/100) and 73.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

TransAlta Corp

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

TransAlta Corporation owns, operates and develops a diverse fleet of electric power generation assets in Canada, the United States and Australia. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?