WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsTransAlta Corp (TAC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TransAlta Corp generates 176% more annual revenue ($2.40B vs $871.93M). KEN leads profitability with a 7.6% profit margin vs -5.7%. KEN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 40/100 (F).

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23

TAC

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.5Value: 5.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.14
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-39.8%)

Margin of Safety

-39.8%

Fair Value

$54.56

Current Price

$93.04

$38.48 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.56Overvalued
TACUndervalued (+38.3%)

Margin of Safety

+38.3%

Fair Value

$21.96

Current Price

$12.48

$9.48 discount

UndervaluedFair: $21.96Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

TAC0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
69.1x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

TAC4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
11.2x4/10

Trading at 11.2x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.982/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-9.6%2/10

ROE of -9.6% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TAC

TAC has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 69.1x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : TAC

The primary concerns for TAC are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a hypergrowth stock while TAC is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

TAC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.46 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

TAC generates stronger free cash flow (147M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KEN scores higher overall (40/100 vs 31/100) and 43.1% revenue growth. TAC offers better value entry with a 38.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

TransAlta Corp

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

TransAlta Corporation owns, operates and develops a diverse fleet of electric power generation assets in Canada, the United States and Australia. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?