WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsTalen Energy Corporation (TLN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Talen Energy Corporation generates 239% more annual revenue ($2.63B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs -8.3%. KEN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 44/100 (D).

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

TLN

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 7.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

TLN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
58.0%10/10

Revenue surging 58.0% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
34.5%8/10

Earnings expanding 34.5% YoY

Areas to Watch

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-102.0%1/10

Operating margin of -102.0%

TLN4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Price/BookValuation
12.7x4/10

Trading at 12.7x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-17.7%2/10

ROE of -17.7% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
-8.3%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Operating MarginProfitability
-36.1%1/10

Operating margin of -36.1%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -102.0%.

Bull Case : TLN

The strongest argument for TLN centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 58.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : TLN

The primary concerns for TLN are Price/Book, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a mature stock while TLN is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

TLN carries more volatility with a beta of 1.61 — expect wider price swings.

TLN is growing revenue faster at 58.0% — sustainability is the question.

TLN generates stronger free cash flow (240M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KEN scores higher overall (44/100 vs 42/100), backed by strong 63.8% margins. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Talen Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

None

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?