WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsStem Inc (STEM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Kenon Holdings generates 458% more annual revenue ($871.93M vs $156.27M). STEM leads profitability with a 88.2% profit margin vs 7.6%. STEM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 44/100 (D).

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23

STEM

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-40.1%)

Margin of Safety

-40.1%

Fair Value

$54.44

Current Price

$87.72

$33.28 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.44Overvalued
STEMUndervalued (+77.9%)

Margin of Safety

+77.9%

Fair Value

$52.09

Current Price

$10.70

$41.39 discount

UndervaluedFair: $52.09Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

STEM1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
88.2%10/10

Keeps 88 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
69.1x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

STEM4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$96.73M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-5921.0%2/10

ROE of -5921.0% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-15.6%2/10

Revenue declined 15.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : STEM

The strongest argument for STEM centers on Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 88.2% and operating margin at 8.3%.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 69.1x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : STEM

The primary concerns for STEM are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a hypergrowth stock while STEM is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

STEM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.41 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

KEN generates stronger free cash flow (53M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

STEM scores higher overall (44/100 vs 40/100), backed by strong 88.2% margins. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Stem Inc

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - RENEWABLE · USA

Stem, Inc. is an energy technology company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Millbrae, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?