WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsSAP SE ADR (SAP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

SAP SE ADR generates 4653% more annual revenue ($36.80B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 19.5%. SAP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

SAP

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 3.09
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

SAPSignificantly Overvalued (-88.8%)

Margin of Safety

-88.8%

Fair Value

$104.04

Current Price

$168.95

$64.91 premium

UndervaluedFair: $104.04Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

SAP6 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$217.55B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.0910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.189/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.798/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
29.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 29.2%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.09B8/10

Generating 1.1B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

SAP2 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.3x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.3%4/10

3.3% revenue growth

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bull Case : SAP

The strongest argument for SAP centers on Market Cap, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.5% and operating margin at 29.2%. PEG of 0.79 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : SAP

The primary concerns for SAP are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a mature stock while SAP is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

SAP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.69 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 8.3% — sustainability is the question.

SAP generates stronger free cash flow (1.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SAP scores higher overall (58/100 vs 44/100), backed by strong 19.5% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

SAP SE ADR

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

SAP SE is a global enterprise application software company. The company is headquartered in Walldorf, Germany.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?