Haverty Furniture Companies Inc (HVT-A)vsMEDIFAST INC (MED)
HVT-A
Haverty Furniture Companies Inc
$24.01
-1.32%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $386.45M
MED
MEDIFAST INC
$12.23
-1.05%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $134.54M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Haverty Furniture Companies Inc generates 121% more annual revenue ($766.48M vs $346.10M). HVT-A leads profitability with a 2.6% profit margin vs -5.8%. MED appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.97. HVT-A earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (D+).
HVT-A
Hold50
out of 100
Grade: D+
MED
Hold45
out of 100
Grade: D
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+58.2%
Fair Value
$69.69
Current Price
$24.01
$45.68 discount
Intrinsic value data unavailable for MED.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Reasonable price relative to book value
Reasonable price relative to book value
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Growing faster than its price suggests
Areas to Watch
4.1% revenue growth
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 2.9% — below average capital efficiency
2.6% margin — thin
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Weak financial health signals
ROE of -10.1% — below average capital efficiency
Revenue declined 34.3%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : HVT-A
The strongest argument for HVT-A centers on Price/Book. PEG of 1.16 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : MED
The strongest argument for MED centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.97 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : HVT-A
The primary concerns for HVT-A are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity. Thin 2.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : MED
The primary concerns for MED are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
HVT-A profiles as a value stock while MED is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.
HVT-A carries more volatility with a beta of 1.17 — expect wider price swings.
HVT-A is growing revenue faster at 4.1% — sustainability is the question.
MED generates stronger free cash flow (-836,000), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
HVT-A scores higher overall (50/100 vs 45/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Haverty Furniture Companies Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA
Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. is a specialty retailer of residential furniture and accessories in the United States. The company is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.
MEDIFAST INC
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · PERSONAL SERVICES · USA
Medifast, Inc. manufactures and distributes weight loss, weight management, healthy living products, and other consumable health and nutrition products in the United States and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland.
Visit Website →Compare with Other HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?