WallStSmart

Haverty Furniture Companies Inc (HVT-A)vsMEDIFAST INC (MED)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Haverty Furniture Companies Inc generates 146% more annual revenue ($780.39M vs $316.93M). HVT-A leads profitability with a 2.9% profit margin vs -8.1%. MED appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.97. HVT-A earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

HVT-A

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.0Value: 7.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.96

MED

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 5.09
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

HVT-AUndervalued (+62.4%)

Margin of Safety

+62.4%

Fair Value

$77.52

Current Price

$28.61

$48.91 discount

UndervaluedFair: $77.52Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MED.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

HVT-A2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
100.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 100.0% YoY

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

MED4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
0.6x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.0910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.149/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.978/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

HVT-A4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$482.38M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
4.0%3/10

ROE of 4.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.9%3/10

2.9% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.4%3/10

Operating margin of 3.4%

MED4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$141.66M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-10.1%2/10

ROE of -10.1% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-27.6%2/10

Revenue declined 27.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : HVT-A

The strongest argument for HVT-A centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book. PEG of 1.37 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : MED

The strongest argument for MED centers on Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. PEG of 0.97 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : HVT-A

The primary concerns for HVT-A are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 2.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : MED

The primary concerns for MED are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

HVT-A profiles as a value stock while MED is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

HVT-A carries more volatility with a beta of 1.18 — expect wider price swings.

HVT-A is growing revenue faster at 7.7% — sustainability is the question.

HVT-A generates stronger free cash flow (18M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

HVT-A scores higher overall (57/100 vs 45/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Haverty Furniture Companies Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. is a specialty retailer of residential furniture and accessories in the United States. The company is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.

MEDIFAST INC

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · PERSONAL SERVICES · USA

Medifast, Inc. manufactures and distributes weight loss, weight management, healthy living products, and other consumable health and nutrition products in the United States and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?