Floor & Decor Holdings Inc (FND)vsMEDIFAST INC (MED)
FND
Floor & Decor Holdings Inc
$47.41
-3.05%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $5.77B
MED
MEDIFAST INC
$12.23
-1.05%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $134.54M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Floor & Decor Holdings Inc generates 1251% more annual revenue ($4.68B vs $346.10M). FND leads profitability with a 4.3% profit margin vs -5.8%. MED appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.97. MED earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D).
FND
Hold40
out of 100
Grade: D
MED
Hold45
out of 100
Grade: D
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+15.3%
Fair Value
$81.36
Current Price
$47.41
$33.95 discount
Intrinsic value data unavailable for MED.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Reasonable price relative to book value
Reasonable price relative to book value
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Growing faster than its price suggests
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Moderate valuation
4.3% margin — thin
Operating margin of 4.5%
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Weak financial health signals
ROE of -10.1% — below average capital efficiency
Revenue declined 34.3%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : FND
The strongest argument for FND centers on Price/Book.
Bull Case : MED
The strongest argument for MED centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.97 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : FND
The primary concerns for FND are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Profit Margin. Thin 4.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : MED
The primary concerns for MED are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FND profiles as a value stock while MED is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.
FND carries more volatility with a beta of 1.62 — expect wider price swings.
FND is growing revenue faster at -0.7% — sustainability is the question.
FND generates stronger free cash flow (46M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
MED scores higher overall (45/100 vs 40/100). FND offers better value entry with a 15.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Floor & Decor Holdings Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. is a multi-channel specialty retailer of hard surface flooring and related accessories. The company is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.
Visit Website →MEDIFAST INC
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · PERSONAL SERVICES · USA
Medifast, Inc. manufactures and distributes weight loss, weight management, healthy living products, and other consumable health and nutrition products in the United States and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland.
Visit Website →Compare with Other HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?