WallStSmart

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc (FND)vsMEDIFAST INC (MED)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc generates 1387% more annual revenue ($4.71B vs $316.93M). FND leads profitability with a 4.9% profit margin vs -8.1%. MED appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.97. FND earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).

FND

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.0Value: 6.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.05

MED

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 5.09
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FNDUndervalued (+15.1%)

Margin of Safety

+15.1%

Fair Value

$81.23

Current Price

$47.34

$33.89 discount

UndervaluedFair: $81.23Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MED.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FND2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
53.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 53.4% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

MED4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
0.6x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.0910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.149/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.978/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

FND3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.204/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.0%4/10

3.0% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

4.9% margin — thin

MED4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$141.66M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-10.1%2/10

ROE of -10.1% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-27.6%2/10

Revenue declined 27.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FND

The strongest argument for FND centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book.

Bull Case : MED

The strongest argument for MED centers on Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. PEG of 0.97 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FND

The primary concerns for FND are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Profit Margin. Thin 4.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : MED

The primary concerns for MED are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FND profiles as a value stock while MED is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

FND carries more volatility with a beta of 1.55 — expect wider price swings.

FND is growing revenue faster at 3.0% — sustainability is the question.

FND generates stronger free cash flow (96M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FND scores higher overall (53/100 vs 45/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. is a multi-channel specialty retailer of hard surface flooring and related accessories. The company is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.

Visit Website →

MEDIFAST INC

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · PERSONAL SERVICES · USA

Medifast, Inc. manufactures and distributes weight loss, weight management, healthy living products, and other consumable health and nutrition products in the United States and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?