WallStSmart

Humana Inc (HUM)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Humana Inc generates 3539% more annual revenue ($137.20B vs $3.77B). WAT leads profitability with a 11.9% profit margin vs 0.8%. WAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.60. HUM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

HUM

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.5Value: 5.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.91

WAT

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 3.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.85
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

HUMUndervalued (+23.7%)

Margin of Safety

+23.7%

Fair Value

$403.67

Current Price

$350.08

$53.59 discount

UndervaluedFair: $403.67Overvalued
WATSignificantly Overvalued (-84.6%)

Margin of Safety

-84.6%

Fair Value

$178.29

Current Price

$365.36

$187.07 premium

UndervaluedFair: $178.29Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

HUM4 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.9110/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.5%8/10

Revenue surging 23.5% year-over-year

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.13B8/10

Generating 1.1B in free cash flow

WAT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
91.4%10/10

Revenue surging 91.4% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.8510/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

HUM4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.154/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
6.1%3/10

ROE of 6.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.8%3/10

0.8% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.7%3/10

Operating margin of 4.7%

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.604/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
8.5x4/10

Trading at 8.5x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
2.9%3/10

ROE of 2.9% — below average capital efficiency

Operating MarginProfitability
2.8%3/10

Operating margin of 2.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : HUM

The strongest argument for HUM centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 23.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 91.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : HUM

The primary concerns for HUM are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 40.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 0.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 45.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

WAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.20 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 91.4% — sustainability is the question.

HUM generates stronger free cash flow (1.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor HEALTHCARE PLANS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

HUM scores higher overall (52/100 vs 50/100) and 23.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Humana Inc

HEALTHCARE · HEALTHCARE PLANS · USA

Humana Inc. is a for-profit American health insurance company based in Louisville, Kentucky.

Visit Website →

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?