WallStSmart

Humana Inc (HUM)vsMerck & Company Inc (MRK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Humana Inc generates 109% more annual revenue ($137.20B vs $65.77B). MRK leads profitability with a 13.6% profit margin vs 0.8%. HUM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.56. HUM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

HUM

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.5Value: 6.7Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.37

MRK

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 8.0Value: 2.7Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

HUMUndervalued (+80.9%)

Margin of Safety

+80.9%

Fair Value

$1139.79

Current Price

$274.26

$865.53 discount

UndervaluedFair: $1139.79Overvalued
MRKSignificantly Overvalued (-15.9%)

Margin of Safety

-15.9%

Fair Value

$97.84

Current Price

$111.28

$13.44 premium

UndervaluedFair: $97.84Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

HUM4 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3710/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.5%8/10

Revenue surging 23.5% year-over-year

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.13B8/10

Generating 1.1B in free cash flow

MRK3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Market CapQuality
$280.20B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Operating MarginProfitability
38.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 38.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.93B8/10

Generating 2.9B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

HUM4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.564/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
29.2x4/10

Moderate valuation

Return on EquityProfitability
6.3%3/10

ROE of 6.3% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.8%3/10

0.8% margin — thin

MRK4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
32.0x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.9%4/10

4.9% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.182/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : HUM

The strongest argument for HUM centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 23.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : MRK

The strongest argument for MRK centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : HUM

The primary concerns for HUM are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Return on Equity. Thin 0.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : MRK

The primary concerns for MRK are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

HUM profiles as a growth stock while MRK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

HUM carries more volatility with a beta of 0.68 — expect wider price swings.

HUM is growing revenue faster at 23.5% — sustainability is the question.

MRK generates stronger free cash flow (2.9B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

HUM scores higher overall (57/100 vs 50/100) and 23.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Humana Inc

HEALTHCARE · HEALTHCARE PLANS · USA

Humana Inc. is a for-profit American health insurance company based in Louisville, Kentucky.

Visit Website →

Merck & Company Inc

HEALTHCARE · DRUG MANUFACTURERS - GENERAL · USA

Merck & Co. is an American multinational pharmaceutical company headquartered in Kenilworth, New Jersey. It is named after the Merck family, which set up Merck Group in Germany in 1668.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?