WallStSmart

HubSpot Inc (HUBS)vsSonos Inc (SONO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

HubSpot Inc generates 126% more annual revenue ($3.30B vs $1.46B). HUBS leads profitability with a 3.0% profit margin vs 1.6%. SONO trades at a lower P/E of 92.8x. HUBS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

HUBS

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 9.3Profit: 4.0Value: 7.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.48

SONO

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.0Value: 3.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.04
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

HUBSUndervalued (+59.7%)

Margin of Safety

+59.7%

Fair Value

$519.57

Current Price

$212.64

$306.93 discount

UndervaluedFair: $519.57Overvalued
SONOSignificantly Overvalued (-34.6%)

Margin of Safety

-34.6%

Fair Value

$12.26

Current Price

$15.08

$2.82 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

HUBS4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3010/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

EPS GrowthGrowth
968.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 968.0% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.129/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.4%8/10

Revenue surging 23.4% year-over-year

SONO2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.159/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

HUBS4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.0%3/10

ROE of 5.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.0%3/10

3.0% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.3%3/10

Operating margin of 3.3%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.88B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.6%3/10

1.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : HUBS

The strongest argument for HUBS centers on PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 23.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.30 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : HUBS

The primary concerns for HUBS are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. A P/E of 98.9x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 92.8x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

HUBS profiles as a growth stock while SONO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.94 — expect wider price swings.

HUBS is growing revenue faster at 23.4% — sustainability is the question.

HUBS generates stronger free cash flow (183M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

HUBS scores higher overall (59/100 vs 45/100) and 23.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

HubSpot Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

HubSpot, Inc. provides a cloud-based customer relationship management (CRM) platform for companies in the Americas, Europe, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?