Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS)vsMicron Technology Inc (MU)
GS
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$841.84
+0.73%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $250.66B
MU
Micron Technology Inc
$382.09
-3.40%
TECHNOLOGY · Cap: $446.05B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Goldman Sachs Group Inc generates 2% more annual revenue ($59.40B vs $58.12B). MU leads profitability with a 41.5% profit margin vs 28.9%. MU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.23. MU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 83/100 (A-).
GS
Strong Buy73
out of 100
Grade: B
MU
Exceptional Buy83
out of 100
Grade: A-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+52.4%
Fair Value
$1768.48
Current Price
$841.84
$926.64 discount
Margin of Safety
+61.5%
Fair Value
$992.16
Current Price
$382.09
$610.07 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Strong operational efficiency at 38.3%
Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
15.2% revenue growth
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Growing faster than its price suggests
Every $100 of equity generates 40 in profit
Keeps 42 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 67.6%
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Areas to Watch
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
2.0% revenue growth
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : GS
The strongest argument for GS centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.9% and operating margin at 38.3%. Revenue growth of 15.2% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : MU
The strongest argument for MU centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 41.5% and operating margin at 67.6%. PEG of 0.23 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : GS
The primary concerns for GS are Free Cash Flow.
Bear Case : MU
The primary concerns for MU are Revenue Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
GS profiles as a growth stock while MU is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
MU carries more volatility with a beta of 1.54 — expect wider price swings.
GS is growing revenue faster at 15.2% — sustainability is the question.
MU generates stronger free cash flow (6.5B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
MU scores higher overall (83/100 vs 73/100), backed by strong 41.5% margins. GS offers better value entry with a 52.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Exceptional Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered in New York City. It offers services in investment management, securities, asset management, prime brokerage, and securities underwriting. It also provides investment banking to institutional investors.
Micron Technology Inc
TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTORS · USA
Micron Technology, Inc. is an American producer of computer memory and computer data storage including dynamic random-access memory, flash memory, and USB flash drives. It is headquartered in Boise, Idaho.
Visit Website →Compare with Other CAPITAL MARKETS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?