WallStSmart

GoPro Inc (GPRO)vsRoadzen Inc. (RDZN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

GoPro Inc generates 842% more annual revenue ($568.59M vs $60.35M). GPRO leads profitability with a -28.5% profit margin vs -46.9%. GPRO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 37/100 (F).

GPRO

Hold

37

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -1.59

RDZN

Avoid

29

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.5Value: 8.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: -7.08
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for GPRO.

RDZNUndervalued (+38.9%)

Margin of Safety

+38.9%

Fair Value

$2.47

Current Price

$1.20

$1.27 discount

UndervaluedFair: $2.47Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GPRO2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-2.6310/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.738/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

RDZN3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
6.2x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Revenue GrowthGrowth
49.0%10/10

Revenue surging 49.0% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
-1.0310/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

GPRO4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$278.58M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-236.1%2/10

ROE of -236.1% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-31.3%2/10

Revenue declined 31.3%

RDZN4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$110.72M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-5.94M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GPRO

The strongest argument for GPRO centers on Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.73 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : RDZN

The strongest argument for RDZN centers on P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 49.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : GPRO

The primary concerns for GPRO are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : RDZN

The primary concerns for RDZN are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GPRO profiles as a turnaround stock while RDZN is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

GPRO carries more volatility with a beta of 2.45 — expect wider price swings.

RDZN is growing revenue faster at 49.0% — sustainability is the question.

RDZN generates stronger free cash flow (-6M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GPRO scores higher overall (37/100 vs 29/100). RDZN offers better value entry with a 38.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

GoPro Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

GoPro, Inc. develops and sells mountable and portable cameras, drones, and accessories in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in San Mateo, California.

Roadzen Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

RoadZen, lnc. The company is headquartered in New Delhi, India.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?