WallStSmart

Acushnet Holdings Corp (GOLF)vsTrugolf Inc (TRUG)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Acushnet Holdings Corp generates 12356% more annual revenue ($2.56B vs $20.54M). GOLF leads profitability with a 7.4% profit margin vs -93.1%. GOLF earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 40/100 (D).

GOLF

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 4.7Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 134.37

TRUG

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 3.3Profit: 2.5Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.88
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

GOLFSignificantly Overvalued (-371.9%)

Margin of Safety

-371.9%

Fair Value

$21.15

Current Price

$93.62

$72.47 premium

UndervaluedFair: $21.15Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TRUG.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GOLF2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
134.3710/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
23.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

TRUG1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

GOLF4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
30.0x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Profit MarginProfitability
7.4%3/10

7.4% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.063/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

TRUG4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$3.11M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GOLF

The strongest argument for GOLF centers on Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity.

Bull Case : TRUG

The strongest argument for TRUG centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : GOLF

The primary concerns for GOLF are P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : TRUG

The primary concerns for TRUG are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GOLF profiles as a value stock while TRUG is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

GOLF carries more volatility with a beta of 0.91 — expect wider price swings.

GOLF is growing revenue faster at 7.2% — sustainability is the question.

TRUG generates stronger free cash flow (-675,900), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GOLF scores higher overall (40/100 vs 32/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Acushnet Holdings Corp

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

Acushnet Holdings Corp. The company is headquartered in Fairhaven, Massachusetts.

Trugolf Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

TruGolf Holdings, Inc., through its subsidiary, engages in the development and sale of indoor golf simulator hardware under the TruGolf Nevada brand for residential and commercial markets in the United States. The company is headquartered in Centerville, Utah.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?