WallStSmart

Gfl Environmental Holdings Inc (GFL)vsMontrose Environmental Grp (MEG)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Gfl Environmental Holdings Inc generates 739% more annual revenue ($6.97B vs $830.54M). MEG leads profitability with a -0.1% profit margin vs -2.9%. GFL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 43/100 (D).

GFL

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 6.0Profit: 3.5Value: 5.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 0.80

MEG

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.5Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.14
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for GFL.

MEGUndervalued (+34.1%)

Margin of Safety

+34.1%

Fair Value

$37.27

Current Price

$22.14

$15.13 discount

UndervaluedFair: $37.27Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GFL3 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.3%8/10

16.3% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
22.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 22.2% YoY

MEG1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

GFL4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.383/10

Elevated debt levels

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.1%2/10

ROE of -3.1% — below average capital efficiency

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.802/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
-2.9%1/10

Currently unprofitable

MEG4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.2%4/10

2.2% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$800.80M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GFL

The strongest argument for GFL centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 16.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : MEG

The strongest argument for MEG centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : GFL

The primary concerns for GFL are Debt/Equity, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : MEG

The primary concerns for MEG are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Market Cap.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GFL profiles as a growth stock while MEG is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

MEG carries more volatility with a beta of 2.00 — expect wider price swings.

GFL is growing revenue faster at 16.3% — sustainability is the question.

GFL generates stronger free cash flow (122M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GFL scores higher overall (43/100 vs 38/100) and 16.3% revenue growth. MEG offers better value entry with a 34.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Gfl Environmental Holdings Inc

INDUSTRIALS · WASTE MANAGEMENT · USA

GFL Environmental Inc. is a diversified environmental services company in Canada and the United States. The company is headquartered in Vaughan, Canada.

Visit Website →

Montrose Environmental Grp

INDUSTRIALS · WASTE MANAGEMENT · USA

Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. is an environmental services company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Irvine, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?