WallStSmart

Clean Harbors Inc (CLH)vsMontrose Environmental Grp (MEG)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Clean Harbors Inc generates 652% more annual revenue ($6.24B vs $830.54M). CLH leads profitability with a 7.0% profit margin vs -0.1%. CLH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

CLH

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.17

MEG

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.5Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.14
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CLHSignificantly Overvalued (-36.2%)

Margin of Safety

-36.2%

Fair Value

$201.67

Current Price

$322.82

$121.15 premium

UndervaluedFair: $201.67Overvalued
MEGUndervalued (+34.1%)

Margin of Safety

+34.1%

Fair Value

$37.27

Current Price

$22.14

$15.13 discount

UndervaluedFair: $37.27Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLH2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.2710/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

EPS GrowthGrowth
36.4%8/10

Earnings expanding 36.4% YoY

MEG1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CLH4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
38.5x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Profit MarginProfitability
7.0%3/10

7.0% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.043/10

Elevated debt levels

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-151.94M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

MEG4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.2%4/10

2.2% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$800.80M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLH

The strongest argument for CLH centers on PEG Ratio, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 11.9% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.27 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : MEG

The strongest argument for MEG centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : CLH

The primary concerns for CLH are P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : MEG

The primary concerns for MEG are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Market Cap.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLH profiles as a value stock while MEG is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

MEG carries more volatility with a beta of 2.00 — expect wider price swings.

CLH is growing revenue faster at 11.9% — sustainability is the question.

MEG generates stronger free cash flow (47M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CLH scores higher overall (67/100 vs 38/100) and 11.9% revenue growth. MEG offers better value entry with a 34.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Clean Harbors Inc

INDUSTRIALS · WASTE MANAGEMENT · USA

Clean Harbors, Inc. provides environmental and industrial services in North America. The company is headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts.

Montrose Environmental Grp

INDUSTRIALS · WASTE MANAGEMENT · USA

Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. is an environmental services company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Irvine, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?