WallStSmart

Gfl Environmental Holdings Inc (GFL)vsLanzaTech Global Inc. (LNZA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Gfl Environmental Holdings Inc generates 11375% more annual revenue ($6.70B vs $58.38M). GFL leads profitability with a 3.1% profit margin vs -76.0%. GFL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

GFL

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 0.80

LNZA

Hold

37

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -16.14
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for GFL.

LNZAUndervalued (+85.7%)

Margin of Safety

+85.7%

Fair Value

$68.46

Current Price

$5.45

$63.01 discount

UndervaluedFair: $68.46Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GFL2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
22.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 22.2% YoY

LNZA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
26.8%8/10

Revenue surging 26.8% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

GFL4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
3.3%3/10

ROE of 3.3% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.1%3/10

3.1% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.2%3/10

Operating margin of 3.2%

Debt/EquityHealth
1.363/10

Elevated debt levels

LNZA4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$99.81M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-189.4%2/10

ROE of -189.4% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-9.32M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GFL

The strongest argument for GFL centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : LNZA

The strongest argument for LNZA centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 26.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : GFL

The primary concerns for GFL are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. A P/E of 97.2x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : LNZA

The primary concerns for LNZA are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GFL profiles as a value stock while LNZA is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

LNZA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.35 — expect wider price swings.

LNZA is growing revenue faster at 26.8% — sustainability is the question.

LNZA generates stronger free cash flow (-9M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GFL scores higher overall (48/100 vs 37/100). LNZA offers better value entry with a 85.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Gfl Environmental Holdings Inc

INDUSTRIALS · WASTE MANAGEMENT · USA

GFL Environmental Inc. is a diversified environmental services company in Canada and the United States. The company is headquartered in Vaughan, Canada.

Visit Website →

LanzaTech Global Inc.

INDUSTRIALS · WASTE MANAGEMENT · USA

LanzaTech Global, Inc. is a nature-based carbon refining company in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. The company is headquartered in Skokie, Illinois.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?