WallStSmart

Forgent Power Solutions, Inc. (FPS)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Waters Corporation generates 259% more annual revenue ($3.17B vs $882.45M). WAT leads profitability with a 20.3% profit margin vs 2.1%. FPS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.39. WAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

FPS

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 8.0Profit: 4.5Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0

WAT

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 9.0Value: 7.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FPS.

WATSignificantly Overvalued (-349.9%)

Margin of Safety

-349.9%

Fair Value

$73.17

Current Price

$289.16

$215.99 premium

UndervaluedFair: $73.17Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FPS2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3910/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Revenue GrowthGrowth
83.9%10/10

Revenue surging 83.9% year-over-year

WAT4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.8%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
29.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
20.3%9/10

Keeps 20 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

FPS4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.1%3/10

2.1% margin — thin

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-23.14M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

WAT2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.1%2/10

Earnings declined 3.1%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FPS

The strongest argument for FPS centers on PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 83.9% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.39 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Operating Margin, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.3% and operating margin at 33.8%. PEG of 1.25 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FPS

The primary concerns for FPS are EPS Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 2.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FPS profiles as a hypergrowth stock while WAT is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

FPS is growing revenue faster at 83.9% — sustainability is the question.

WAT generates stronger free cash flow (126M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

WAT scores higher overall (60/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 20.3% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Forgent Power Solutions, Inc.

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Forgent Power Solutions, Inc designs and manufactures electrical distribution equipment used in data centers, the power grid and energy-intensive industrial facilities. The company is headquartered in Dayton, Minnesota.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?