WallStSmart

Forgent Power Solutions, Inc. (FPS)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Waters Corporation generates 276% more annual revenue ($3.77B vs $1.00B). WAT leads profitability with a 11.9% profit margin vs 1.4%. FPS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.46. WAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).

FPS

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 8.0Profit: 4.5Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0

WAT

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FPS.

WATSignificantly Overvalued (-63.1%)

Margin of Safety

-63.1%

Fair Value

$201.83

Current Price

$348.07

$146.24 premium

UndervaluedFair: $201.83Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FPS2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4610/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Revenue GrowthGrowth
69.0%10/10

Revenue surging 69.0% year-over-year

WAT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
91.5%10/10

Revenue surging 91.5% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

FPS4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.4%3/10

1.4% margin — thin

Price/BookValuation
26.1x2/10

Trading at 26.1x book value

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.584/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
8.1x4/10

Trading at 8.1x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
5.2%3/10

ROE of 5.2% — below average capital efficiency

P/E RatioValuation
44.3x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FPS

The strongest argument for FPS centers on PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 69.0% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.46 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 91.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FPS

The primary concerns for FPS are EPS Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 1.4% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 44.3x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FPS profiles as a hypergrowth stock while WAT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 91.5% — sustainability is the question.

FPS generates stronger free cash flow (-23M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

WAT scores higher overall (53/100 vs 40/100) and 91.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Forgent Power Solutions, Inc.

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Forgent Power Solutions, Inc designs and manufactures electrical distribution equipment used in data centers, the power grid and energy-intensive industrial facilities. The company is headquartered in Dayton, Minnesota.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?