WallStSmart

Hubbell Inc (HUBB)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Hubbell Inc generates 59% more annual revenue ($6.00B vs $3.77B). HUBB leads profitability with a 15.1% profit margin vs 11.9%. WAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.58. HUBB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

HUBB

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 8.5Value: 4.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 4/9

WAT

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

HUBBSignificantly Overvalued (-68.2%)

Margin of Safety

-68.2%

Fair Value

$306.75

Current Price

$490.16

$183.41 premium

UndervaluedFair: $306.75Overvalued
WATSignificantly Overvalued (-63.1%)

Margin of Safety

-63.1%

Fair Value

$201.83

Current Price

$348.07

$146.24 premium

UndervaluedFair: $201.83Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

HUBB1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
25.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

WAT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
91.5%10/10

Revenue surging 91.5% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

HUBB2 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.384/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
29.0x4/10

Moderate valuation

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.584/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
8.1x4/10

Trading at 8.1x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
5.2%3/10

ROE of 5.2% — below average capital efficiency

P/E RatioValuation
44.3x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : HUBB

The strongest argument for HUBB centers on Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.1% and operating margin at 17.7%. Revenue growth of 11.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 91.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : HUBB

The primary concerns for HUBB are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 44.3x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

HUBB profiles as a mature stock while WAT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

WAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.14 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 91.5% — sustainability is the question.

HUBB generates stronger free cash flow (46M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

HUBB scores higher overall (62/100 vs 53/100), backed by strong 15.1% margins and 11.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Hubbell Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Hubbell Incorporated designs, manufactures, and sells electrical and electronic products in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Shelton, Connecticut.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?