WallStSmart

Fluent Inc (FLNT)vsOmnicom Group Inc (OMC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Omnicom Group Inc generates 10967% more annual revenue ($22.37B vs $202.15M). OMC leads profitability with a 1.7% profit margin vs -11.5%. FLNT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.81. OMC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

FLNT

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 6.0Profit: 2.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -5.24

OMC

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.7Profit: 5.5Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.77
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FLNT.

OMCUndervalued (+19.0%)

Margin of Safety

+19.0%

Fair Value

$85.56

Current Price

$79.01

$6.55 discount

UndervaluedFair: $85.56Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FLNT1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
33527.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 33527.0% YoY

OMC3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
63.4%10/10

Revenue surging 63.4% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
58.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 58.8% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FLNT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.814/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
11.9x4/10

Trading at 11.9x book value

Market CapQuality
$102.09M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-137.3%2/10

ROE of -137.3% — below average capital efficiency

OMC4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
3.9%3/10

ROE of 3.9% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.7%3/10

1.7% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.153/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FLNT

The strongest argument for FLNT centers on EPS Growth.

Bull Case : OMC

The strongest argument for OMC centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 63.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FLNT

The primary concerns for FLNT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Market Cap. Debt-to-equity of 4.27 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : OMC

The primary concerns for OMC are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity. A P/E of 219.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FLNT profiles as a turnaround stock while OMC is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

FLNT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.75 — expect wider price swings.

OMC is growing revenue faster at 63.4% — sustainability is the question.

FLNT generates stronger free cash flow (-5M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

OMC scores higher overall (67/100 vs 42/100) and 63.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Fluent Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Fluent, Inc. provides data-driven digital marketing services primarily in the United States. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Omnicom Group Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Omnicom Group Inc. is an American global media, marketing and corporate communications holding company, headquartered in New York City.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?