WallStSmart

Fluent Inc (FLNT)vsOmnicom Group Inc (OMC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Omnicom Group Inc generates 9396% more annual revenue ($19.82B vs $208.76M). OMC leads profitability with a 0.3% profit margin vs -13.0%. FLNT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.81. OMC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

FLNT

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.5Value: 4.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -5.07

OMC

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.0Value: 4.3Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.77
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FLNT.

OMCUndervalued (+5.4%)

Margin of Safety

+5.4%

Fair Value

$73.25

Current Price

$75.31

$2.06 discount

UndervaluedFair: $73.25Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FLNT1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
33527.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 33527.0% YoY

OMC2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
69.2%10/10

Revenue surging 69.2% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FLNT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.814/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Market CapQuality
$66.19M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
1.6%3/10

Operating margin of 1.6%

Return on EquityProfitability
-137.3%2/10

ROE of -137.3% — below average capital efficiency

OMC4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.7%3/10

ROE of 0.7% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.3%3/10

0.3% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.223/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FLNT

The strongest argument for FLNT centers on EPS Growth.

Bull Case : OMC

The strongest argument for OMC centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 69.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FLNT

The primary concerns for FLNT are PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 2.33 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : OMC

The primary concerns for OMC are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity. Thin 0.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FLNT profiles as a turnaround stock while OMC is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

FLNT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.89 — expect wider price swings.

OMC is growing revenue faster at 69.2% — sustainability is the question.

FLNT generates stronger free cash flow (5M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

OMC scores higher overall (51/100 vs 41/100) and 69.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Fluent Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Fluent, Inc. provides data-driven digital marketing services primarily in the United States. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Omnicom Group Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Omnicom Group Inc. is an American global media, marketing and corporate communications holding company, headquartered in New York City.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?