WallStSmart

Ferrovial SE (FER)vsYum! Brands Inc (YUM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ferrovial SE generates 13% more annual revenue ($9.63B vs $8.49B). YUM leads profitability with a 20.5% profit margin vs 9.2%. YUM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.96. YUM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 3.7Quality: 5.0

YUM

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 8.0Value: 4.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FER.

YUMSignificantly Overvalued (-77.2%)

Margin of Safety

-77.2%

Fair Value

$89.76

Current Price

$156.02

$66.26 premium

UndervaluedFair: $89.76Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.43B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

YUM4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Operating MarginProfitability
31.0%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 31.0%

EPS GrowthGrowth
72.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 72.2% YoY

Profit MarginProfitability
20.5%9/10

Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
15.2%8/10

15.2% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

FER3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
5.572/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
48.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-87.6%2/10

Earnings declined 87.6%

YUM4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.964/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
25.5x4/10

Moderate valuation

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

The strongest argument for FER centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : YUM

The strongest argument for YUM centers on Operating Margin, EPS Growth, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.5% and operating margin at 31.0%. Revenue growth of 15.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. A P/E of 48.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : YUM

The primary concerns for YUM are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FER profiles as a value stock while YUM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

FER carries more volatility with a beta of 0.81 — expect wider price swings.

YUM is growing revenue faster at 15.2% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

YUM scores higher overall (65/100 vs 38/100), backed by strong 20.5% margins and 15.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Yum! Brands Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Yum! Brands, Inc. is an American fast food corporation listed on the Fortune 1000. Yum! operates the brands KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, The Habit Burger Grill, and WingStreet worldwide, except in China, where the brands are operated by a separate company, Yum China.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?