WallStSmart

Ferrovial SE (FER)vsQuanta Services Inc (PWR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Quanta Services Inc generates 234% more annual revenue ($32.91B vs $9.86B). FER leads profitability with a 6.2% profit margin vs 4.0%. PWR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.40. PWR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 3.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.94

PWR

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 9.3Profit: 5.5Value: 4.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 2.13

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

PWR3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
41.1%10/10

Revenue surging 41.1% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
94.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 94.7% YoY

Market CapQuality
$97.81B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

FER4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
6.2%3/10

6.2% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.863/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
8.642/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
58.9x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

PWR4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Price/BookValuation
10.1x4/10

Trading at 10.1x book value

Profit MarginProfitability
4.0%3/10

4.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
74.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

FER has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bull Case : PWR

The strongest argument for PWR centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 41.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.40 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are Profit Margin, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 58.9x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 1.86 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : PWR

The primary concerns for PWR are Price/Book, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 74.6x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 4.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FER profiles as a value stock while PWR is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

PWR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.20 — expect wider price swings.

PWR is growing revenue faster at 41.1% — sustainability is the question.

PWR generates stronger free cash flow (864M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PWR scores higher overall (63/100 vs 38/100) and 41.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Quanta Services Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Quanta Services is an American corporation that provides infrastructure services for electric power, pipeline, industrial and communications industries. Capabilities include the planning, design, installation, program management, maintenance and repair of most types of network infrastructure.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?