WallStSmart

Ferrovial SE (FER)vsMasTec Inc (MTZ)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

MasTec Inc generates 63% more annual revenue ($16.11B vs $9.86B). FER leads profitability with a 6.2% profit margin vs 3.1%. MTZ appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.72. MTZ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 3.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.94

MTZ

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.7Profit: 5.5Value: 5.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.43

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

MTZ3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
51.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 51.4% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
0.728/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.4%8/10

Revenue surging 23.4% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

FER4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
6.2%3/10

6.2% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.863/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
8.642/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
58.9x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

MTZ3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
39.1x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Profit MarginProfitability
3.1%3/10

3.1% margin — thin

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-70.08M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

FER has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bull Case : MTZ

The strongest argument for MTZ centers on EPS Growth, PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 23.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.72 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are Profit Margin, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 58.9x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 1.86 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : MTZ

The primary concerns for MTZ are P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Free Cash Flow. Thin 3.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FER profiles as a value stock while MTZ is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

MTZ carries more volatility with a beta of 1.82 — expect wider price swings.

MTZ is growing revenue faster at 23.4% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (733M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MTZ scores higher overall (66/100 vs 38/100) and 23.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

MasTec Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

MasTec, Inc., an infrastructure construction company, provides engineering, construction, installation, maintenance, and upgrade services for communications, energy, utilities, and other infrastructure primarily in the United States and Canada. The company is headquartered in Coral Gables, Florida.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?