WallStSmart

Ferrovial SE (FER)vsViking Holdings Ltd (VIK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ferrovial SE generates 45% more annual revenue ($9.63B vs $6.66B). VIK leads profitability with a 18.0% profit margin vs 9.2%. VIK trades at a lower P/E of 35.3x. VIK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.0Value: 3.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.94

VIK

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 9.3Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.40

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.43B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

VIK3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
112.4%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 112 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
226.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 226.6% YoY

Revenue GrowthGrowth
17.5%8/10

17.5% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

FER4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
5.192/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
49.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-87.6%2/10

Earnings declined 87.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.942/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

VIK4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
35.3x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Operating MarginProfitability
1.1%3/10

Operating margin of 1.1%

Price/BookValuation
38.6x2/10

Trading at 38.6x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.402/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

The strongest argument for FER centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : VIK

The strongest argument for VIK centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.0% and operating margin at 1.1%. Revenue growth of 17.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. A P/E of 49.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : VIK

The primary concerns for VIK are P/E Ratio, Operating Margin, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FER profiles as a value stock while VIK is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

VIK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.59 — expect wider price swings.

VIK is growing revenue faster at 17.5% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

VIK scores higher overall (57/100 vs 38/100), backed by strong 18.0% margins and 17.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Viking Holdings Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · TRAVEL SERVICES · USA

Viking Holdings Ltd engages in the passenger shipping and other forms of passenger transport in North America, the United Kingdom, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Pembroke, Bermuda.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?