WallStSmart

Ferrovial SE (FER)vsSony Group Corp (SONY)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sony Group Corp generates 136706% more annual revenue ($13.17T vs $9.63B). FER leads profitability with a 9.2% profit margin vs -1.6%. SONY appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.71. SONY earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 47/100 (D+).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 3.7Quality: 5.0

SONY

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.43B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

SONY4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$898.45B10/10

Generating 898.5B in free cash flow

Market CapQuality
$118.69B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
15.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FER3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
5.572/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
48.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-87.6%2/10

Earnings declined 87.6%

SONY3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.5%4/10

0.5% revenue growth

PEG RatioValuation
2.712/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
-1.6%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

The strongest argument for FER centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : SONY

The strongest argument for SONY centers on Free Cash Flow, Market Cap, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. A P/E of 48.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : SONY

The primary concerns for SONY are Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FER profiles as a value stock while SONY is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

FER carries more volatility with a beta of 0.81 — expect wider price swings.

FER is growing revenue faster at 5.7% — sustainability is the question.

SONY generates stronger free cash flow (898.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SONY scores higher overall (47/100 vs 38/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Sony Group Corp

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sony Group Corporation designs, develops, produces and sells electronic equipment, instruments and devices for the consumer, professional and industrial markets worldwide. The company is headquartered in Tokyo, Japan.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?