WallStSmart

Ferrovial SE (FER)vsSeaboard Corporation (SEB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Seaboard Corporation generates 2% more annual revenue ($9.83B vs $9.63B). FER leads profitability with a 9.2% profit margin vs 5.9%. SEB appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.65. SEB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (B-).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.0Value: 3.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.94

SEB

Strong Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.5Value: 6.7Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 3.59
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FER.

SEBSignificantly Overvalued (-28.6%)

Margin of Safety

-28.6%

Fair Value

$4331.44

Current Price

$5433.10

$1101.66 premium

UndervaluedFair: $4331.44Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.43B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

SEB6 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
277.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 277.0% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.5910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.658/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

FER4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
5.192/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
49.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-87.6%2/10

Earnings declined 87.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.942/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

SEB4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.6%4/10

3.6% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
5.9%3/10

5.9% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.0%3/10

Operating margin of 4.0%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-150.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

The strongest argument for FER centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : SEB

The strongest argument for SEB centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth. PEG of 0.65 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. A P/E of 49.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : SEB

The primary concerns for SEB are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Operating Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FER carries more volatility with a beta of 0.80 — expect wider price swings.

FER is growing revenue faster at 5.7% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

SEB scores higher overall (65/100 vs 38/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Seaboard Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · CONGLOMERATES · USA

Seaboard Corporation is a global agribusiness and transportation company. The company is headquartered in Merriam, Kansas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?