WallStSmart

Ferrovial SE (FER)vsSea Ltd (SE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sea Ltd generates 138% more annual revenue ($22.94B vs $9.63B). FER leads profitability with a 9.2% profit margin vs 6.9%. SE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.60. SE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 70/100 (B-).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 3.7Quality: 5.0

SE

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 6/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FER.

SEUndervalued (+52.8%)

Margin of Safety

+52.8%

Fair Value

$242.40

Current Price

$90.02

$152.38 discount

UndervaluedFair: $242.40Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.43B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

SE4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
38.4%10/10

Revenue surging 38.4% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
58.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 58.2% YoY

Market CapQuality
$52.80B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.608/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

FER3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
5.572/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
48.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-87.6%2/10

Earnings declined 87.6%

SE3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Profit MarginProfitability
6.9%3/10

6.9% margin — thin

Free Cash FlowQuality
$02/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

The strongest argument for FER centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : SE

The strongest argument for SE centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 38.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.60 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. A P/E of 48.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : SE

The primary concerns for SE are P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FER profiles as a value stock while SE is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.70 — expect wider price swings.

SE is growing revenue faster at 38.4% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

SE scores higher overall (70/100 vs 38/100) and 38.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Sea Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Sea Limited is engaged in the digital entertainment, e-commerce and digital financial services businesses in Southeast Asia, Latin America, the rest of Asia and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?