Ferrovial SE (FER)vsMatrix Service Co (MTRX)
FER
Ferrovial SE
$66.81
+0.53%
INDUSTRIALS · Cap: $48.65B
MTRX
Matrix Service Co
$13.81
+0.80%
INDUSTRIALS · Cap: $384.59M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Ferrovial SE generates 1039% more annual revenue ($9.63B vs $845.48M). FER leads profitability with a 9.2% profit margin vs -1.8%. MTRX appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.30. MTRX earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).
FER
Hold38
out of 100
Grade: F
MTRX
Buy52
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Intrinsic value data unavailable for FER.
Margin of Safety
+11.4%
Fair Value
$13.13
Current Price
$13.81
$0.68 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Generating 1.4B in free cash flow
Earnings expanding 175.0% YoY
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Earnings declined 87.6%
Distress zone — elevated risk
3.3% revenue growth
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Operating margin of 0.9%
Weak financial health signals
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : FER
The strongest argument for FER centers on Free Cash Flow.
Bull Case : MTRX
The strongest argument for MTRX centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, Price/Book. PEG of 1.30 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : FER
The primary concerns for FER are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. A P/E of 49.6x leaves little room for execution misses.
Bear Case : MTRX
The primary concerns for MTRX are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Operating Margin.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FER profiles as a value stock while MTRX is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.
MTRX carries more volatility with a beta of 0.99 — expect wider price swings.
FER is growing revenue faster at 5.7% — sustainability is the question.
FER generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
MTRX scores higher overall (52/100 vs 38/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Ferrovial SE
INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA
Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Matrix Service Co
INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA
Matrix Service Company provides engineering, manufacturing, infrastructure, construction, and maintenance services primarily to the oil, gas, energy, petrochemical, industrial, agricultural, mining, and mineral markets in the United States, Canada, South Korea, Australia, and internationally. . The company is headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Compare with Other ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?