WallStSmart

Ferrovial N.V. (FER)vsMegan Holdings Limited (MGN)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ferrovial N.V. generates 11819% more annual revenue ($9.86B vs $82.72M). FER leads profitability with a 6.2% profit margin vs -8.3%. FER earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 38/100 (F).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 3.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.94

MGN

Avoid

29

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 3.3Profit: 2.5Value: 5.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.80

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

MGN2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

FER4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
31.3x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Profit MarginProfitability
6.2%3/10

6.2% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.863/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
9.062/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

MGN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$2.47M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
2.1%3/10

ROE of 2.1% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-8.4%2/10

Revenue declined 8.4%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-31.3%2/10

Earnings declined 31.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

FER has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bull Case : MGN

The strongest argument for MGN centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 1.86 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : MGN

The primary concerns for MGN are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FER profiles as a value stock while MGN is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

FER is growing revenue faster at 5.2% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (733M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FER scores higher overall (38/100 vs 29/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial N.V.

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Megan Holdings Limited

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Megan Holdings Limited (MGN) is a diversified investment firm focusing on real estate and financial services, committed to delivering long-term value through strategic acquisitions and operational excellence. Guided by a seasoned management team, MGN aims to enhance shareholder returns while upholding robust corporate governance and sustainability principles. The company is strategically positioned to capitalize on emerging market opportunities and adapt to the evolving needs of its stakeholders, reinforcing its status as a resilient leader within its sectors.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?