WallStSmart

Ferrovial SE (FER)vsKBR Inc (KBR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ferrovial SE generates 28% more annual revenue ($9.86B vs $7.72B). FER leads profitability with a 6.2% profit margin vs 5.5%. KBR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.54. KBR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 71/100 (B).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 3.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.94

KBR

Strong Buy

71

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.7Profit: 6.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.18
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FER.

KBRSignificantly Overvalued (-36.1%)

Margin of Safety

-36.1%

Fair Value

$30.05

Current Price

$36.59

$6.54 premium

UndervaluedFair: $30.05Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

KBR5 strengths · Avg: 8.6/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.9x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
25.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.548/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
33.1%8/10

Earnings expanding 33.1% YoY

Areas to Watch

FER4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
6.2%3/10

6.2% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.863/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
8.642/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
58.9x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

KBR3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.6%4/10

1.6% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
5.5%3/10

5.5% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.713/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

FER has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bull Case : KBR

The strongest argument for KBR centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.54 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are Profit Margin, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 58.9x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 1.86 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : KBR

The primary concerns for KBR are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 1.71 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FER carries more volatility with a beta of 0.78 — expect wider price swings.

FER is growing revenue faster at 5.2% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (733M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

KBR scores higher overall (71/100 vs 38/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

KBR Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

KBR, Inc. provides engineering, science, and technology solutions to governments and commercial customers worldwide. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?