WallStSmart

Ferrovial SE (FER)vsIES Holdings Inc (IESC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ferrovial SE generates 165% more annual revenue ($9.63B vs $3.63B). IESC leads profitability with a 10.5% profit margin vs 9.2%. IESC trades at a lower P/E of 40.0x. IESC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.0Value: 3.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.94

IESC

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.7Profit: 8.0Value: 4.7Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 4.73

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.43B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

IESC5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
Return on EquityProfitability
35.5%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 35 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
55.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 55.4% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.7310/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.109/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.8%8/10

16.8% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

FER4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
5.192/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
49.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-87.6%2/10

Earnings declined 87.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.942/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

IESC2 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
40.0x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
13.4x4/10

Trading at 13.4x book value

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

The strongest argument for FER centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : IESC

The strongest argument for IESC centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 16.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. A P/E of 49.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : IESC

The primary concerns for IESC are P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FER profiles as a value stock while IESC is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

IESC carries more volatility with a beta of 1.79 — expect wider price swings.

IESC is growing revenue faster at 16.8% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

IESC scores higher overall (58/100 vs 38/100) and 16.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

IES Holdings Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

IES Holdings, Inc. designs and installs integrated electrical and technology systems and provides infrastructure products and services in the United States. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?