WallStSmart

Ferrovial SE (FER)vsGranite Construction Incorporated (GVA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ferrovial SE generates 108% more annual revenue ($9.63B vs $4.64B). FER leads profitability with a 9.2% profit margin vs 4.0%. GVA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.16. GVA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.0Value: 3.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.94

GVA

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.7Profit: 5.0Value: 6.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.94

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.43B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

GVA3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.1610/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Revenue GrowthGrowth
30.4%10/10

Revenue surging 30.4% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
25.1%8/10

Earnings expanding 25.1% YoY

Areas to Watch

FER4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
5.192/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
49.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-87.6%2/10

Earnings declined 87.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.942/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

GVA4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
38.3x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.944/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Profit MarginProfitability
4.0%3/10

4.0% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.323/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

The strongest argument for FER centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : GVA

The strongest argument for GVA centers on PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 30.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.16 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. A P/E of 49.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : GVA

The primary concerns for GVA are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin. Thin 4.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FER profiles as a value stock while GVA is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

GVA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.33 — expect wider price swings.

GVA is growing revenue faster at 30.4% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GVA scores higher overall (64/100 vs 38/100) and 30.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Granite Construction Incorporated

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Granite Construction Incorporated is an infrastructure contractor and producer of building materials in the United States. The company is headquartered in Watsonville, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?